Prince Harry’s case is difficult the best way the Royal and VIP
Government Committee (Ravec) took the choice on his safety preparations after
he stepped down from being a working royal in 2020.
Throughout final month’s Court docket of Enchantment listening to, Harry’s
barrister argued that Harry had been topic
to a “totally different and so-called bespoke course of”.
Shaheed Fatima KC informed the courtroom that he was “singled
out for various, unjustified and inferior remedy”.
Final yr, the Excessive Court docket dominated that there had been no
unlawfulness in Ravec’s unique resolution.
As a result of the Residence Workplace has obligation for Ravec’s
selections, it’s opposing the enchantment on its behalf.
Its barrister, James Eadie KC, argued that Harry’s resolution
to step again from his life as a working royal resulted in a
“distinctive set of circumstances”, and it was proper to take a
versatile method to his stage of safety.
Whereas Ravec had “phrases of reference” for deciding
safety measures, there was “nothing to recommend they have been designed to
function rigidly and never flexibly”, he mentioned.