The Trial Mark Zuckerberg Couldn’t Forestall

This transcript was created utilizing speech recognition software program. Whereas it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it could include errors. Please overview the episode audio earlier than quoting from this transcript and e mail transcripts@nytimes.com with any questions.

From “The New York Occasions,” I’m Rachel Abrams. That is the “Every day.”

[THEME MUSIC]

Testimonies started this week in one of the crucial aggressive instances the federal government has ever introduced in opposition to an enormous tech firm. And over the subsequent eight weeks, the Federal Commerce Fee will argue that Meta, the corporate based by Mark Zuckerberg in his school dorm room, needs to be damaged up.

At present, my colleague Cecilia Kang on the unusual and contentious relationship between Zuckerberg and President Trump that has led to this second and what the case means for each of them.

It’s Thursday, April 17.

[THEME MUSIC]

Cecilia, you might be speaking to me out of your automobile, I consider. Why are you speaking to me out of your automobile?

Yeah, I needed to run to my automobile as a result of I’m on a lunch break throughout an antitrust trial the place the Federal Commerce Fee is in search of to interrupt up. Meta. And this can be a actually high-stakes case for Meta and for Mark Zuckerberg, as a result of this case actually threatens the corporate’s total existence. It’s existential as a result of the federal government is making an attempt to interrupt up this firm that he co-founded twenty years in the past.

And I’ve simply spent the primary half of this week watching Zuckerberg testify as the primary and star witness within the authorities’s case in opposition to Meta. And after I return, he’ll end up, after which we could have the previous chief working officer, Sheryl Sandberg, testify.

What’s the primary week been like?

It’s been fairly loopy. Lengthy strains to get into the courtroom. The courtroom itself is filled with Meta’s many, many attorneys, in addition to the FTC’s attorneys and media, and loads of simply individuals from the general public. And it’s fascinating as a result of up till actually the minutes earlier than the trial started, I wasn’t even positive that it was going to occur.

Why is that?

In latest weeks, senior Fb officers have been making an attempt to get the White Home to cease this case from going to trial. And just lately, as we reported, Mark Zuckerberg was on the White Home himself assembly with the president and his prime aides making an attempt to get the president to drop this case earlier than it may go to trial.

And so this case, which has big implications, will be seen as a mirrored image of this ongoing and unusual relationship between these two males, Zuckerberg and President Trump.

It’s shocking to listen to what you’re saying as a result of we’ve talked on the present about how the massive tech giants have been more and more cozying as much as President Trump. I believe lots of people, myself included, noticed pictures of Zuckerberg on the inauguration. I had the impression that these two males have been no less than somewhat bit heat towards one another. So possibly you possibly can simply unpack this somewhat bit. What precisely is their relationship, and the way has it affected this case?

So it’s fascinating. The story of Zuckerberg and Trump actually goes again virtually a decade, and their relationship has actually modified and developed over these years. I believe it’s honest to say that what began as a narrative of two very highly effective however very completely different and possibly even opposing figures has become one thing fairly completely different.

Recently, Zuckerberg has been very optimistic about Trump. He’s actually tried to get into Trump’s internal circle. However Trump at this level has not returned the identical kind of curiosity nor affection. I might say that the connection is fairly one sided at this level.

Mm-hmm.

Zuckerberg, for many of Fb’s historical past, has by no means been overtly political. It’s truly a thriller as to how he votes. He donates to each events. He’s not significantly vocal about politics typically. Issues get somewhat bit extra sophisticated in terms of Trump’s first election victory in 2016. That was an enormous deal for Fb however not essentially in a optimistic method.

I do not forget that. Fb was actually extensively seen as one of many causes that Trump gained the election.

That’s proper. The left blamed Fb for Trump’s victory. They are saying that there was a surge of political misinformation that actually helped Trump in successful. And Zuckerberg reacts to those issues by creating new insurance policies and new modifications to the platform, instituting issues like reality checking, all with the aim of making an attempt to gradual the unfold of misinformation on the location.

And the precise hates this. They are saying that these actions are primarily censorship. And censorship of conservatives. They are saying that the corporate’s leaders and their staff are liberal, and so they have a bias that’s in opposition to conservatives in Trump. And Trump comes out for the primary time as anti-Fb

It feels like hating Fb principally turns into like a bipartisan challenge at this level.

Sure. At this level, we’re beginning to see Fb getting caught in between each political events. And finally, the Federal Commerce Fee underneath the Trump administration decides to sue in December 2020, which was proper earlier than they go away workplace. That lawsuit results in the trial that I’ve been overlaying this week.

After which on January 6, we all know what occurs. Trump’s supporters stormed the Capitol. And at first, he’s urging the crowds. And whereas his supporters are within the Capitol constructing and police are attempting to take management of the scenario, Trump addresses his supporters in a video.

I do know your ache. I do know you’re damage. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everybody is aware of it.

That video is posted throughout social media, together with Fb and Instagram.

Folks in regulation and order we don’t need anyone damage. It’s a really robust time period. There’s by no means been a time like this the place —

And staff of the corporate, in addition to the general public are very involved with Trump’s speech. What Fb decides to do subsequent is essential. They resolve to take away these movies, and so they cite a coverage that the corporate has on speech. The corporate forbids any kind of incitement of violence.

After which Fb escalates. Fb decides to take away Trump fully off the platform.

Trump interprets that as a shot throughout the bow, and at that time, he determines that Fb is an enemy. However when President Biden comes into workplace, unexpectedly, it’s Zuckerberg feeling like Fb is being censored.

How so?

The actual flashpoint was in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and when the Biden White Home was reaching out to Fb senior executives and actually railing on them to clamp down on misinformation associated to the virus.

The Biden administration, in keeping with Zuckerberg and staff at Meta, was fairly strict about what sort of data that they thought was misinformation. Any kind of skepticism concerning the vaccine, in addition to any kind of dialog, even round COVID, the place there may need been simply questions raised or possibly even satirical content material about COVID-19 was the topic of actual scrutiny by the Biden administration.

And White Home officers have been telling Meta that they should take down all that content material, which Meta thought was an actual overreach. And, in reality, the connection between Meta and the Biden administration solely will get worse as soon as Biden appoints an actual trustbuster, Lina Khan, to be his prime antitrust regulator.

Lina is a widely known determine inside the very small and esoteric world of antitrust regulation. And he or she is seen as one of many largest threats throughout company America. And Lina Khan picks up that antitrust go well with in opposition to Meta that was initiated within the Trump administration.

So it feels like at this level, principally, Zuckerberg and the Biden administration couldn’t be farther aside.

Sure. The animosity between the Biden administration and Meta solely grows. And the corporate’s feeling very very like a goal.

In order Zuckerberg’s relationship with Biden is deteriorating, what’s occurring along with his relationship to Trump at this cut-off date?

Nicely, the true inflection level was the assassination try on Trump. And that was a second when Mark Zuckerberg noticed Trump emerge and get up from that stage in Pennsylvania along with his fist pumped within the air, blood coming down his face.

I imply, seeing Donald Trump stand up after getting shot within the face —

Zuckerberg later commented that he thought that was such a second of heroism.

— one of the crucial badass issues I’ve ever seen in my life. However —

And that he thought that, in his phrases, that Trump was an actual badass.

— at some degree as an American, it’s laborious to not get emotional about that spirit and that battle. And I believe that that’s why lots of people just like the man.

And that was the primary time that I had heard Zuckerberg actually converse out so positively about a politician. He’d been very cautious for a few years to not take any robust place in politics.

After which after the 2024 election, issues actually begin to choose up. We see Zuckerberg virtually racing to point out his affection for Trump.

Fb founder Mark Zuckerberg had a personal assembly with the President-elect immediately at Mar-a-Lago.

First, he publicly congratulates the president on his election.

Nicely, Mark Zuckerberg has been over to see me, and —

He visits the President-elect in Mar a Lago.

What’s occurring? Yeah, chill week.

Yeah, kind of.

He goes on the “Joe Rogan podcast.”

And it’s one of many issues that I’m optimistic about with President Trump is, I believe, he simply needs America to win.

And for fairly a while talks about how a lot he admired the president.

These individuals from the Biden administration would name up our group and scream at them and curse. And it’s like these —

And the way he had change into so annoyed with the Democratic-led former White Home.

Hey, everybody, I wish to discuss one thing vital immediately. We see Zuckerberg additionally change insurance policies inside the firm. Right here’s what we’re going to do. First, we’re going to eliminate reality checkers and substitute them with Group Notes just like X beginning within the US.

He eliminates reality checking.

What began as a motion to be extra inclusive has more and more been used to close down opinions and shut out individuals with completely different concepts. And it’s gone too far.

And he additionally eliminates DEI, range, fairness, inclusion efforts on the firm.

The latest elections additionally really feel like a cultural tipping level in direction of as soon as once more prioritizing speech.

These two huge coverage modifications appear very a lot aligned with the Trump agenda. And —

For a first-rate instance of how Trump went from pariah to highly effective, look to Meta. The corporate confirms it made $1 million contribution to Trump’s inaugural fund.

— Meta donates $1 million to the Trump inauguration.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

He’s actually pulling out all of the stops.

He’s pulling out all of the stops. It’s taking place in fast hearth all inside a compressed few weeks.

And you understand whether or not or not he believes in President Trump or whether or not he’s simply making an attempt to do one of the best factor for his corporations, I assume that doesn’t actually matter, as a result of he’s gone full MAGA, proper? He’s absolutely aligning himself with the brand new administration. However I’ve to notice that the place we’re immediately, it doesn’t look like any of that helped him that a lot.

Yeah, Rachel, I don’t assume so. The president nonetheless holds a grudge in opposition to Zuckerberg and Meta.

And as any individual very near the president advised me just some days in the past, the president nonetheless needs his pound of flesh.

[Music playing]

We’ll be proper again.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

So, Cecilia, we simply talked about how Zuckerberg couldn’t get Trump to make this case go away. However what precisely is the case that the federal government is bringing right here?

Yeah, this case is absolutely fairly novel in that this all facilities round two acquisitions greater than a decade in the past, the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. And what the federal authorities is arguing is that Fb had a monopoly after they purchased these corporations and thru these acquisitions they have been capable of hold their monopoly.

The explanation why that’s such a eyebrow-raising argument, specifically, is as a result of the very company that’s suing Meta was the company that accepted these mergers greater than a decade in the past within the first place.

OK. Clarify that?

So I’ve bought to take you again in a time machine to round 2011, 2012. And this was a extremely pivotal time for Fb. Fb actually struggled to create an app for the smartphone, and so they have been beginning to see competitors, significantly from Instagram, that made Mark Zuckerberg very nervous, as a result of Instagram had this new and really fascinating picture sharing app.

And so Zuckerberg in 2012 determined to purchase Instagram, which didn’t have that many customers and had only a few staff, for $1 billion.

Wow.

That in itself was an enormous deal at the moment, however regulators thought that it was such a small firm, Instagram, and it didn’t straight compete with Fb as a social community that they felt comfy of permitting that merger to undergo.

After which, Zuckerberg bought nervous once more. Round 2014, he noticed the rise of messaging apps like WeChat in China and WhatsApp, which was an app that was extremely popular globally, actually selecting up steam and getting tons of customers all over the world.

And he was afraid that these sorts of messaging apps may additionally compete with Fb, as a result of they may tackle extra social options like sharing between family and friends. So then in 2014, he buys WhatsApp for $19 billion.

Wow.

Big price ticket that drew a ton of curiosity on the time. However once more, regulators stated, this app doesn’t straight compete with Fb, so sure, we’ll approve it. So each mergers accepted by the Federal Commerce Fee.

So it feels like from what you’re saying that there weren’t any alarm bells ringing on the time when Fb was buying these corporations, however, clearly, one thing modified. What modified and why?

Nicely, a pair issues modified. First, Fb turns into very highly effective. It hits 3.5 billion customers. And that sheer scale places a highlight on Fb. All of a sudden, individuals see that it has change into an important place for thus many individuals all over the world to acquire and to share data. And as soon as individuals begin recognizing that particularly across the 2016 and 2020 elections, it modifications the notion of Fb and Mark Zuckerberg.

The opposite factor that modifications is that regulators begin trying on the Silicon Valley corporations very otherwise. They see that these web giants solely get greater and stronger in methods which might be sudden.

They begin to take a look at acquisitions that these corporations have made over time which will haven’t appeared both threatening or anti-competitive on the time, as a result of these huge corporations are sometimes shopping for very small startups, however these acquisitions change into actually vital instruments for these corporations to proceed to develop and to keep up their monopolies.

It was once that the important thing method to decide if a monopoly was breaking the regulation was whether or not costs have been going up for customers. However how does that apply to an web firm, particularly an organization that has apps like Fb and Instagram, that are free? And so regulators are saying there are completely different ways in which we must always have a look at how these corporations have an excessive amount of energy.

So what’s the hurt that the federal government is arguing that Meta poses right here precisely if not ripping individuals off when it comes to how a lot they’re paying for a product?

So the federal government is arguing that there are different methods customers have been harmed. They are saying that if these mergers weren’t accepted, that possibly Instagram and WhatsApp would have created way more competitors that will spur Fb to be extra modern and to make their app higher.

So that you would possibly see fewer issues like information privateness scandals. You would possibly see the corporate do a greater job in terms of containing misinformation. All this stuff that aren’t associated to cost however do have an effect on the patron expertise. And most apparently, the Trump administration has launched a brand new wrinkle.

President Trump and his prime antitrust regulators have argued that these platforms censor speech, and that their potential to censor speech is an actual signal, a symptom of an issue, which is that they’re too highly effective. So they’re arguing for the primary time that I’ve heard a speech principle that antitrust enforcement ought to embody issues about speech.

Cecilia, I can’t assist however discover that Zuckerberg, who has change into this like free speech absolutist and rolled again a lot of the corporate’s previous efforts to censor content material on the platform, he’s truly now the goal of a case the president or his administration is taking over, no less than partially, as a result of he thinks Meta holds an excessive amount of energy to form speech.

So it’s actually ironic. In some methods, Zuckerberg and Trump need the identical factor. They need full free speech on the web. They need no censorship. And Zuckerberg has tried to sign to Trump that, hey, we’re on the identical facet on this challenge.

However despite the fact that Zuckerberg has tried to do this and made so many different efforts to attempt to appease Trump, it actually hasn’t landed in the way in which that Zuckerberg needs and wishes. He nonetheless has to undergo this trial. And that’s as a result of despite the fact that they could agree on some issues, Fb remains to be considered as merely simply too huge.

But it surely kind of feels like, from what you’ve defined, that the federal government has a little bit of an uphill battle right here for 2 causes. One, they principally must say, look, despite the fact that we accepted these mergers again within the day, we’ve modified our thoughts. We wish to unwind them, which appears robust.

And two, they’ve additionally bought this new argument the place they’re making an attempt to show new harms in a principle that’s form of been untested earlier than. So ought to I take it from what you’ve simply stated that Meta is feeling fairly good about its probabilities right here?

I believe so. I believe Meta is coming in actually confidently. I believe authorized specialists are all saying that this can be a robust case for the FTC. However the true query that I’ve as I watch Mark Zuckerberg end his testimony this week is what’s he successful right here? They could win this trial, however he nonetheless must win over the president.

There are such a lot of different points that relate to his enterprise, and there’s a lot at stake with this administration as the corporate continues to attempt to develop in new areas and develop. So I might say this is only one step in a really lengthy course of for Meta to essentially get again into the nice graces of Washington and significantly to, for the primary time, win over Trump help.

As a result of who is aware of what the subsequent battle shall be.

That’s proper. And there shall be many.

Cecilia, thanks a lot.

Thanks for having me, Rachel.

[THEME MUSIC]

We’ll be proper again.

Right here’s what else you could know immediately. A federal choose threatened to open a contempt investigation into whether or not the Trump administration violated an order the choose issued directing officers to cease planes of Venezuelan migrants from being despatched to El Salvador.

The choose stated he would start the proceedings in opposition to the administration until the White Home offers scores of Venezuelan males deported to El Salvador an opportunity to problem their removing. And on Wednesday, Britain’s Supreme Court docket dominated that trans girls don’t fall inside the authorized definition of ladies underneath the nation’s equality laws, dealing a significant blow to campaigners for transgender rights.

Whereas the 5 judges concerned within the ruling stated the authorized definition of a girl relies on organic intercourse, they emphasize that they weren’t commenting on whether or not trans girls are girls extra broadly, saying it was not the function of the courtroom to adjudicate the that means of gender or intercourse.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

At present’s episode was produced by Nina Feldman and Carlos Prieto. It was edited by Brendan Klinkenberg and Mark George with assist from Mike Benoist. Incorporates unique music by Pat McCusker, Diane Wong, Marion Lozano, and was engineered by Chris Wooden. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly.

[THEME MUSIC]

That’s it for “The Every day.” I’m Rachel Abrams. See you tomorrow.

[THEME MUSIC]